MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163964514 · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/ac0593

Peaks and valleys: oscillatory cerebral blood flow at high altitude protects cerebral tissue oxygenation

2021· article· en· W3163964514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Measurement · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryMount Royal University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute on AgingNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsCerebral blood flowCerebral perfusion pressureOxygenationHypoxia (environmental)Blood flowBrain tissuePerfusionBlood pressureMedicineCerebral circulationEffects of high altitude on humansCerebral autoregulationAnesthesiaCardiologyOxygenInternal medicineChemistryAnatomyAutoregulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction. Oscillatory patterns in arterial pressure and blood flow (at ∼0.1 Hz) may protect tissue oxygenation during conditions of reduced cerebral perfusion and/or hypoxia. We hypothesized that inducing oscillations in arterial pressure and cerebral blood flow at 0.1 Hz would protect cerebral blood flow and cerebral tissue oxygen saturation during exposure to a combination of simulated hemorrhage and sustained hypobaric hypoxia. Methods. Eight healthy human subjects (4 male, 4 female; 30.1 ± 7.6 year) participated in two experiments at high altitude (White Mountain, California, USA; altitude, 3800 m) following rapid ascent and 5–7 d of acclimatization: (1) static lower body negative pressure (LBNP, control condition) was used to induce central hypovolemia by reducing chamber pressure to −60 mmHg for 10 min (0 Hz) , and; (2) oscillatory LBNP where chamber pressure was reduced to −60 mmHg, then oscillated every 5 s between −30 mmHg and −90 mmHg for 10 min (0.1 Hz) . Measurements included arterial pressure, internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow, middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv), and cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (ScO 2 ). Results. Forced 0.1 Hz oscillations in mean arterial pressure and mean MCAv were accompanied by a protection of ScO 2 (0.1 Hz: −0.67% ± 1.0%; 0 Hz: −4.07% ± 2.0%; P = 0.01). However, the 0.1 Hz profile did not protect against reductions in ICA blood flow (0.1 Hz: −32.5% ± 4.5%; 0 Hz: −19.9% ± 8.9%; P = 0.24) or mean MCAv (0.1 Hz: −18.5% ± 3.4%; 0 Hz: −15.3% ± 5.4%; P = 0.16). Conclusions. Induced oscillatory arterial pressure and cerebral blood flow led to protection of ScO 2 during combined simulated hemorrhage and sustained hypoxia. This protection was not associated with the preservation of cerebral blood flow suggesting preservation of ScO 2 may be due to mechanisms occurring within the microvasculature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it