MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164115852 · doi:10.1109/mias.2021.3065325

Energy Optimization for Adjustable-Speed Drive Applications: Increasing Efficiency to Cut Costs and Preserve Assets

2021· article· en· W3164115852 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Industry Applications Magazine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsImperial Oil (Canada)Rockwell Automation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEfficient energy useAutomotive engineeringEnergy consumptionInduction motorInvestment (military)EngineeringEnergy (signal processing)Electric power transmissionProcess (computing)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringControl engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whether you believe there is a connection between carbon dioxide and global warming or not, reducing energy consumption by improving operating efficiency has the benefit of preserving natural resources, reducing production costs, and postponing investment in infrastructure, such as generating stations and transmission lines. Induction motors are a logical target since they are the primary machines in use and account for the vast majority of industrial loads. Loads driven by induction motors consume more than half the electrical energy generated. A small improvement in efficiency has a pronounced effect on overall energy consumption. When a process has a range of operating points, adjustable-speed drives (ASDs) are often employed to realize energy savings based on affinity laws. While this saves substantial energy, it can be further optimized with flux vector control and other techniques. This article examines the topic of optimal energy control, which results in additional energy savings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it