On the road again! Tricycle adaptation with the design of a universal rig
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cerebral palsy is the most common childhood disability impacting motor function. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health defines outcomes that should be achieveable within the Activities and Participation domain. However, many children with cerebral palsy have significant difficulties in achieving activity goals within a typical recreational environment. Despite the well documented benefits of cycling for persons with cerebral palsy for example, it is often difficult to access commercially available adaptive tricycles due to prohibitive costs and varying needs. Even commercially available adaptive tricycles sometimes need to be customized. This paper outlines the design and implementation of a custom tricycle adaptation for a teenager with cerebral palsy, who was previously unable to complete a pedal rotation on any of the many adaptive tricycles she tried. The first phase of the project was the design and implementation of a "test rig" system that allowed different tricycle adaptations to be tested with the client, and could be used with any client. The second stage included two iterations of the design and implementation of adaptations to the tricycle. The final modifications enabled the client to ride independently. Challenges, successes, and recommendations for helping similar clients gain access to cycling are highlighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it