MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Platform for Real-Time Space Health Analytics as a Service Utilizing Space Data Relays

2021· article· en· W3166204664 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carolyn McGregor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpacecraftAdaptation (eye)Cloud computingComputer scienceSpaceflightHuman spaceflightAnalyticsBig dataSpace explorationReliability (semiconductor)Domain (mathematical analysis)Real-time computingSystems engineeringData scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringData miningOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The health, wellness and adaptation response of astronauts during spaceflight is a key component for the success of any manned mission. Physiological and psychological responses of astronauts during spaceflight have been monitored from the first manned missions sixty years ago. However, limited communication networks to and within the spacecraft have limited methods to monitor the health, wellness and adaptation response of astronauts in real-time. This has resulted in a paradigm of astronaut monitoring as discontinuous samplings of physiological data that are captured on board the spacecraft and transported to Earth on storage devices for retrospective down sampled analysis. In 2009, as part of prior research, McGregor proposed a big data analytics framework and platform, that enables the capture and processing of physiological data and other clinical data in real-time for new approaches to real-time health monitoring. The platform, was named the Artemis platform after the Greek goddess of childbearing as the first domain it was used was neonatal intensive care. Its efficacy and reliability as a new approach for real-time health monitoring has been demonstrated in the critical care domain and specifically within the domain of neonatal intensive care. McGregor previously proposed the application of Artemis as an approach for autonomous health monitoring within the spacecraft to support missions within and beyond low Earth orbit. This would enable sophisticated realtime health, wellness and adaptation assessment that did not require the transmission of data beyond the spacecraft. Artemis Cloud has been proposed as a cloud-based approach to provide remote health monitoring. Artemis Cloud enables Health Analytics as a Service and has been demonstrated utilizing the Ontario Research and Innovation Optical Network (ORION) in Ontario and Artemis Cloud instances located at the Compute Ontario advanced research computing node within the Centre for Advanced Computing, Queen's University, Ontario providing remote health monitoring of neonatal intensive care patients at two hospitals in Ontario, Canada. There is great potential for this Health Analytics as a Service model enabled through Artemis Cloud to support the assessment of health, wellness and adaptation response of astronauts in space, however, robust and reliable networks are required. The next stage of space exploration will see unmanned missions using robots that will require prognostics and health management. This will be followed by manned lunar orbiters, Moon bases and Mars missions that will all require the support of health, wellness and adaptation assessment of astronauts engaged in those missions. Deep space hybrid radio frequency and optical networks have great potential to address the current gap in space communication networks. This paper presents a framework and infrastructure to enable real-time equipment monitoring for prognostics and health management and astronaut health monitoring through cloud-based Health Analytics as a Service utilizing space data relays. A key benefit of this approach is its ability to monitor their health and wellbeing onboard the spacecraft as well as enabling the equipment and astronaut's physiological data, and other clinical data, to be sent to an Earth based Mission Control Center within more manageable latencies of seconds or minutes. This will provide a more viable alternative to autonomous only approaches for equipment and astronaut monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringFrench-language works237,207