MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167071550 · doi:10.1002/int.22531

Intelligent optimization for charging scheduling of electric vehicle using exponential Harris Hawks technique

2021· article· en· W3167071550 on OpenAlexaff
Ramkumar Devendiran, Padmanathan Kasinathan, Vigna K. Ramachandaramurthy, Umashankar Subramaniam, Uma Govindarajan, Xavier Fernando

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)ScheduleExponential functionRenewable energyElectric vehicleMathematical optimizationAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coordination of modern transportation system depends heavily on intelligent techniques, information assortment, and its analysis. Sensors play a crucial role in information assortment in charging scheduling of electric vehicles (EVs). EVs are destined to become inevitable due to their innate economic contribution, climate improvement, and social attributes as per United Nation's sustainable development goals. Innovation in EV has gained the interest of many researchers since it is one of the novel green transportation sectors. Moreover, EVs are essential to preserve conventional fuels and to maximize the utilization of renewable sources. Nevertheless, EVs have short driving ranges due to their battery limitation, which hinders the reliability. The charging stations (CS) for EVs are also unevenly distributed. This paper presents a novel strategy to schedule the charging points in EV CSs. The goal is to determine the convenient CS for EVs through Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) model. In this model, the CSs are determined and prioritized using four phases, such as driving, charge planning, charging scheduling, and battery charging. Charging scheduling was designed using a newly developed optimization strategy, exponential Harris Hawks optimization (Exponential HHO) algorithm, which combines two algorithms, Harris Hawks optimization (HHO) and exponential weighted moving average (EWMA). Furthermore, the fitness function was also newly devised by considering parameters such as average waiting time, remaining energy, number of EVs, and distance. The proposed Exponential HHO was validated using VANET simulation and the performance was improved with maximum remaining energy of 52.709 Whr, minimal distance of 27.256 km, and a maximum average waiting time of 0.352 min in comparison with existing methods. To be specific, the proposed Exponential HHO yielded better improvement, especially when considering a large number of vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Intelligent SystemsSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207