Films of the Printed Page: Transmedial Books for Early Soviet Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay examines the representation of film production and reception in Soviet children's books from the 1920s and early 1930s. These publications function both as instructional manuals for teaching children about cinema and as attempts to depict film elements in a different medium. In relation to the institutional development of the Soviet film industry, the publication of children's books about cinema coincides with the mobilization of films for propaganda and educational purposes. At this time there were also increasing warnings about the effect of cinema on children as well as calls for ideologically appropriate film programming for young viewers. The visual language of these publications indicates how writers and artists of Soviet children's books engaged with cinema and adapted cinematic techniques to the printed page. The authors represented cinema's illusion of immediacy, spectator engagement, and principles of narration through the succession of images. Moreover, Soviet children's books about cinema appropriate film techniques and cinematic forms as part of their claim to the realism and authenticity ascribed to cinematic representation. Such translation of elements across media turned Soviet children's books into transmedial objects that allowed readers to enter and engage the media system developing around them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".