MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168884196 · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06143-y

Improvement of grey wolf optimizer with adaptive middle filter to adjust support vector machine parameters to predict diabetes complications

2021· article· en· W3168884196 on OpenAlexaff
Fereshteh Jeyafzam, Babak Vaziri, Mohsen Yaghoubi Suraki, Ali Asghar Rahmani Hosseinabadi, Adam Słowik

Bibliographic record

VenueNeural Computing and Applications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSupport vector machineArtificial intelligenceParticle swarm optimizationMachine learningFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In medical science, collecting and classifying data from various diseases is a vital task. The confused and large amounts of data are problems that prevent us from achieving acceptable results. One of the major problems for diabetic patients is a failure to properly diagnose the disease. As a result of this mistake in diagnosis or failure in early diagnosis, the patient may suffer from complications such as blindness, kidney failure, and cutting off the toes. Nowadays, doctors diagnose the disease by relying on their experience and knowledge and performing complex and time-consuming tests. One of the problems with current diabetic, diagnostic methods is the lack of appropriate features to diagnose the disease and consequently the weakness in its diagnosis, especially in its early stages. Since diabetes diagnosis relies on large amounts of data with many parameters, it is necessary to use machine learning methods such as support vector machine (SVM) to predict the complications of diabetes. One of the disadvantages of SVM is its parameter adjustment, which can be accomplished using metaheuristic algorithms such as particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO), genetic algorithm, or grey wolf optimizer (GWO). In this paper, after preprocessing and preparing the dataset for data mining, we use SVM to predict complications of diabetes based on selected parameters of a patient acquired by laboratory test using improved GWO. We improve the selection process of GWO by employing dynamic adaptive middle filter, a nonlinear filter that assigns appropriate weight to each value based on the data value. Comparison of the final results of the proposed algorithm with classification methods such as a multilayer perceptron neural network, decision tree, simple Bayes, and temporal fuzzy min–max neural network (TFMM-PSO) shows the superiority of the proposed method over the comparable ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeural Computing and ApplicationsSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207