Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Temperature Compensation in Microwave Sensors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The planar nature of microwave sensors leaves them vulnerable to ambient temperature changes with potential impact on the perception of the material under test. A temperature compensation technique is required to consider its direct effect on the dielectric property of materials. In this article, machine learning algorithms are employed in two configurations of classifier and regressor on frequency response of a split-ring resonator operating at 1.19 GHz. A wide range of dielectric constant is covered with concentrations of [0:20%:100%]-methanol/acetone in water with a temperature cycle of 25 °C–50 °C. This broad variety of cases captures the complicacy of entangled trends that are recognized using classifiers regardless of the measurement temperature. In the next step, the ambient temperature is extracted from the same measured data. This is accomplished by cascading the classifier with a regressor pool that contains trained parameters for individual classes. Highly accurate classification of material types followed by their corresponding temperature (using linear regression with <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}=97$ </tex-math></inline-formula> % averaged over tenfold cross validation and a mean absolute error of 0.58 °C) leads to investigating limit of detection in the proposed scheme. This step, through testing of [0:1%:5%] methanol in water, identified multilayer perceptron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM) as the best performing algorithms. Final hyperparameter optimization yields parameters for these two models that provide accuracy of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it