MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3169449442

Stochastic Finite Element Modelling of Human Middle-Ear

2021· article· en· W3169449442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCMBES Proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodMiddle earStochastic modellingComputer scienceStochastic processHuman earProcess (computing)Work (physics)Applied mathematicsMathematicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringAcousticsPhysicsStructural engineeringStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modelling the mechanics of the middle-ear is important as it can extend our knowledge about the hearing process and enable us to develop new devices for the treatment and diagnosis of hearing disabilities. Most of the works in the literature of the modelling of middle-ear mechanics are focused on deterministic models. These models cannot consider the variability of input parameters that can happen due to the stochastic nature of the mechanical properties of tissues and variability between individuals. Stochastic models can consider the variability in the parameters and make us able to have more realistic representations of the physiology.  In this work, we present a stochastic Finite Element Method (FEM) model of the human middle-ear. We considered uncertainty in all mechanical properties and some geometrical properties of the middle-ear model and studied the effects of these uncertainties on the uncertainties of the outputs of the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it