MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3169644112 · doi:10.1090/jams/1023

Minimal nondegenerate extensions

2023· article· en· W3169644112 on OpenAlexafffund
Theo Johnson-Freyd, David Reutter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Mathematical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAmerican Institute of MathematicsSimons Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove that every slightly degenerate braided fusion category admits a minimal nondegenerate extension, and hence that every pseudo-unitary super modular tensor category admits a minimal modular extension. This completes the program of characterizing minimal nondegenerate extensions of braided fusion categories. Our proof relies on the new subject of fusion 2 2 -categories. We study in detail the Drinfel’d centre Z ( M o d - B ) \mathcal {Z}({_{}\mathrm {Mod}\text {-}\mathcal {B}}) of the fusion 2 2 -category M o d - B {_{}\mathrm {Mod}\text {-}\mathcal {B}} of module categories of a braided fusion 1 1 -category B \mathcal {B} . We show that minimal nondegenerate extensions of B \mathcal {B} correspond to certain trivializations of Z ( M o d - B ) \mathcal {Z}({_{}\mathrm {Mod}\text {-}\mathcal {B}}) . In the slightly degenerate case, such trivializations are obstructed by a class in H 5 ( K ( Z 2 , 2 ) ; k

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207