MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170412541 · doi:10.5518/100/57

Queen’s Market: a successful and specialised market serving diverse communities in Newham and beyond

2021· article· en· W3170412541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Research Online (The Open University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture, Design, and Social History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEconomic and Social Research CouncilLaidlaw Foundation
KeywordsBusinessPublic relationsMarketingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report demonstrates the importance and success of Queen’s Market as a specialist, affordable food and textiles market, and a welcoming and supportive community asset serving migrant and ethnically diverse communities in Newham, east London, and beyond. It is one of three reports documenting evidence from the Markets4People research project1 about the wide-ranging economic, social and cultural benefits produced by three of the UK’s largest and strongest traditional retail markets. Building on previous research, the reports bring a new focus on the importance of markets from the perspective of their existing customers. In each of the three case study markets, the research involved a survey of 500 market users (capturing a representative sample in terms of age, gender and ethnicity), two focus groups with selected user groups and around 10 interviews with key local actors, to contextualise the findings. Queen’s Market was selected for this research as one of three exemplary case studies well-placed to demonstrate the wide-ranging economic, social and cultural benefits of traditional retail markets in the UK. Located in the heart of Newham, east London, Queen’s Market is a covered street market including 164 street trading pitches, 65 small shop units and 20 kiosks. Based in one of the UK’s most ethnically diverse and low-income communities, it plays an important role in providing access to affordable fresh food, as well as relatively low-cost trading opportunities. It is a listed Asset of Community Value, owned and operated by Newham Council, with a dedicated support group, Friends of Queen’s Market, active for over 15 years. Following Rokhsana Fiaz’ appointment as Mayor of Newham in 2018, th e Council began to address several long-standing issues affecting Queen’s Market and to explore redevelopmentoptions for the Market and neighbouring sheltered housing building, Hamara Ghar. In this context, our research has focused on understanding the existing customers’ experience of the Market, including economic, social and cultural aspects, as well as wider governance issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it