MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171435168 · doi:10.1109/twc.2021.3083604

Stochastic Geometry Analysis of User Mobility in RF/VLC Hybrid Networks

2021· article· en· W3171435168 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStochastic geometryVisible light communicationComputer scienceStochastic processRadio frequencyWirelessComputer networkTelecommunicationsOpticsMathematicsPhysicsLight-emitting diode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of visible light communication (VLC) with existing radio frequency (RF) networks has emerged as a new network architecture to meet the rapidly growing traffic demand. The resulting RF/VLC hybrid network structures offer capacity-per-area improvements due to the use of two technologies operating at different frequency bands and the relatively higher base station (BS) density. However, the reduced BS coverage footprints and the heterogeneous BS types result in challenges for user mobility such as frequent handovers and the need for suitable BS association policies. To help addressing these challenges, in this paper, we conduct a user mobility analysis for RF/VLC hybrid networks by deriving the user-to-BS association probabilities and handover rates. The analysis makes use of stochastic geometry and modeling BSs’ locations via a Poisson point process (PPP). Since PPP modeling has not yet been well established for hybrid RF/VLC networks, we support the applicability of our approach by comparing the user mobility performance to those obtained for an actual deployment, a Matérn hard-core point process (MHCPP) based deployment, and a deterministic square lattice deployment of VLC luminaries. Furthermore, since the handover rates directly depend on the association policies, we consider two popular association policies. Our numerical results show that the PPP, the MHCPP, the square lattice, and the actual deployments have comparable performance in terms of handover rates regardless of the association policy, and they highlight the tradeoff between balancing network load and handover rates achieved by the association policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it