Approval of production waste application as modifiers of aluminum alloys
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of a study of the effect of modifying additives from production waste of microsilica and corundum (Al2O3) powders on the structure and phase composition of the AD31 aluminum alloy are presented. In the conditions of the Karaganda Industrial University, melting of the AD31 aluminum alloy was carried out with the addition of 1% of waste powder of silicon production «Silicium Kazakhstan» (now «Tau-Ken Temir») (microsilica grade MK-85) and corundum powder (abrasive waste from cutting discs) as modifiers. The positive effect of modifying additives from industrial waste on the structure and properties of the alloy is revealed - the grain is refined, the phase composition changes, and the properties of modified aluminum alloys improve. To study the samples of the obtained modified alloys, the authors used the method of electron microscopy, as the simplest and fastest way to transfer information about the microstructure, elemental composition and distribution of elements in the sample volume. The conducted studies are relevant from the point of view of recycling waste from metallurgical industries, expanding the raw material base, as well as obtaining new materials with the required complex of functional properties
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it