ExpressGesture: Expressive gesture generation from speech through database matching
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Co‐speech gestures are a vital ingredient in making virtual agents more human‐like and engaging. Automatically generated gestures based on speech‐input often lack realistic and defined gesture form. We present a database‐driven approach guaranteeing defined gesture form. We built a large corpus of over 23,000 motion‐captured co‐speech gestures and select individual gestures based on expressive gesture characteristics that can be estimated from speech audio. The expressive parameters are gesture velocity and acceleration, gesture size, arm swivel, and finger extension. Individual, parameter‐matched gestures are then combined into animated sequences. We evaluate our gesture generation system in two perceptual studies. The first study compares our method to the ground truth gestures as well as mismatched gestures. The second study compares our method to five current generative machine learning models. Our method outperformed mismatched gesture selection in the first study and showed competitive performance in the second.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it