MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174223776 · doi:10.32370/ia_2021_06_10

Problems of Metaphorization in Modern Directing Theater

2021· article· en· W3174223776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Teacher Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaphorAppealContext (archaeology)Variety (cybernetics)AestheticsExpression (computer science)Associative propertyComputer scienceSociologyArtLinguisticsHistoryArtificial intelligencePolitical sciencePhilosophyMathematicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metaphorization as a universal method of replenishing lexical means of expression and creating a complex semantic structure of the production is studied; the types of theatrical metaphors in the context of tendencies of modern directing theater are analyzed; found that primarily metaphorization depends on the goals and objectives of the director, which are focused on filling conceptual gaps and creating a pragmatic effect in the viewer -this leads to predicting understanding of metaphor and appeal to image-associative complexes of current realities.It is revealed that in the modern director's theater there is a process of metaphorization of the surrounding world, in which new metaphorical models appear, and traditional ones are updated and actualized, constantly absorbing new meanings.Within one or another director's theater, there is a variety of activity of appealing to basic metaphors, changing key metaphors and generating new submodels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it