Faces are Different Than Words: Evidence from Associative Priming Studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Associative memory for familiar faces was investigated in two experiments. Pairs of familiar faces were presented for deep or shallow encoding; memory for these pairs was tested by presenting old-intact pairs, old-recombined pairs, and pairs consisting of one or two new faces. In Experiment 1, pairs consisted of two different individuals whereas in Experiment 2, pairs consisted of different views of the same individual. In both experiments, explicit recognition was best for old-intact pairs under deep encoding conditions. No associative priming effects were obtained in either experiment despite using a simultaneous familiarity-judgment task, similar to one that has produced associative priming effects with words (e.g., Goshen-Gottstein & Moscovitch, 1995a).It is proposed that the different associative priming effects obtained with the two types of stimuli may arise from differences in the modular perceptual representation systems for faces and words.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it