MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174302393 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i10.17105

Precision-based Boosting

2021· article· en· W3174302393 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Data Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAdaBoostBoosting (machine learning)Classifier (UML)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMistakePattern recognition (psychology)Word error rateMachine learningClass (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AdaBoost is a highly popular ensemble classification method for which many variants have been published. This paper proposes a generic refinement of all of these AdaBoost variants. Instead of assigning weights based on the total error of the base classifiers (as in AdaBoost), our method uses class-specific error rates. On instance x it assigns a higher weight to a classifier predicting label y on x, if that classifier is less likely to make a mistake when it predicts class y. Like AdaBoost, our method is guaranteed to boost weak learners into strong learners. An empirical study on AdaBoost and one of its multi-class versions, SAMME, demonstrates the superiority of our method on datasets with more than 1,000 instances as well as on datasets with more than three classes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it