MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174363825 · doi:10.3917/gmcc.280.0065

À l’ombre de la protection gaullienne ? L'exil en France des déserteurs américains de la guerre du Vietnam

2020· article· fr· W3174363825 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGuerres mondiales et conflits contemporains · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunism, Protests, Social Movements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avec au moins 500 000 déserteurs et insoumis, les forces armées des États-Unis ont connu la plus grande hémorragie de leur histoire depuis la guerre de Sécession. Et pourtant, ces réfractaires demeurent encore les parents pauvres de l’historiographie pléthorique de la guerre du Vietnam. Si l’immense majorité d’entre eux ont pu rejoindre les États-Unis, plusieurs dizaines de milliers se sont réfugiés au Canada et en Europe. Une centaine, tout au plus, a choisi la France, où ils créèrent l’Union française des déserteurs et insoumis américains. C’est à eux que cet article est consacré, à leur rôle dans le mouvement d’opposition à la guerre du Vietnam, en France, au traitement qui leur a été réservé par les autorités françaises, et à leur implication dans le mouvement de Mai 68, qui valut finalement l’expulsion aux plus activistes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it