EVALUATION OF SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING FOR CNN-BASED CHANGE DETECTION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Over the past few years, many research works have utilized Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in the development of fully automated change detection pipelines from high resolution satellite imagery. Even though CNN architectures can achieve state-of-the-art results in a wide variety of vision tasks, including change detection applications, they require extensive amounts of labelled training examples in order to be able to generalize to new data through supervised learning. In this work we experiment with the implementation of a semi-supervised training approach in an attempt to improve the image semantic segmentation performance of models trained using a small number of labelled image pairs by leveraging information from additional unlabelled image samples. The approach is based on the Mean Teacher method, a semi-supervised approach, successfully applied for image classification and for sematic segmentation of medical images. Mean Teacher uses an exponential moving average of the model weights from previous epochs to check the consistency of the model’s predictions under various perturbations. Our goal is to examine whether its application in a change detection setting can result in analogous performance improvements. The preliminary results of the proposed method appear to be compatible to the results of the traditional fully supervised training. Research is continuing towards fine-tuning of the method and reaching solid conclusions with respect to the potential benefits of the semi-supervised learning approaches in image change detection applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it