Tensor Graph Attention Network for Knowledge Reasoning in Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge graph builds the bridge from massive data generated by the interaction and communication between various objects to intelligent applications and services in Internet of Things. The graph representation learning technology represented by graph neural networks plays an essential role in the understanding and reasoning of the knowledge graph with complicated internal structure. Although they are capable of assigning different attention weights to neighbors, the graph attention network (GAT) and its variants are inherently flawed and inadequate in modeling high-order knowledge graphs with high heterogeneity. Therefore, we propose a novel multirelational GAT framework in this article for knowledge reasoning over heterogeneous graphs by employing tensor and tensor operations. Specifically, we formulate the general high-order heterogeneous knowledge graph first. Then, the tensor GAT (TGAT), composed of three components: 1) heterogeneous information propagation; 2) multimodal semantic-aware attention; and 3) knowledge aggregation, is developed to simulate rich interactions between mixed triples, entities, and relationships when aggregating local information. What is more, we utilize the Tucker model to compress the parameters of TGAT and further reduce the storage and calculation consumption of the intermediate calculation process on the premise of maintaining the expressive power. We conduct extensive experiments to solve the link prediction task on four real-world heterogeneous graphs, and the results demonstrate that the TGAT model proposed in this article remarkably outperforms state-of-the-art competitors and improves the hits@1 accuracy by up to 7.6%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".