Supporting an Expert-centric Process of New Product Introduction With Statistical Machine Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Industries that sell products with short-term or seasonal life cycles must regularly introduce new products. Forecasting the demand for New Product Introduction (NPI) can be challenging due to the fluctuations of many factors such as trend, seasonality, or other external and unpredictable phenomena (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic). Traditionally, NPI is an expertcentric process. This paper presents a study on automating the forecast of NPI demands using statistical Machine Learning (namely, Gradient Boosting and XGBoost). We show how to overcome shortcomings of the traditional data preparation that underpins the manual process. Moreover, we illustrate the role of cross-validation techniques for the hyper-parameter tuning and the validation of the models. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that statistical Machine Learning can forecast NPI demand better than experts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it