MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178013102 · doi:10.1115/1.4051731

Computationally Efficient and Accurate Solution for Colebrook Equation Based on Lagrange Theorem

2021· article· en· W3178013102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputationPipeline (software)Inversion (geology)Series (stratigraphy)Applied mathematicsPower seriesMathematicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Computationally efficient solutions (less computation time) for the Colebrook equation are essential for simulating pipeline networks. However, the friction law resistance formula has an implicit form for the friction factor. In this study, a computationally efficient and accurate solution for the friction head loss in pipeline networks is developed using the Lagrange inversion theorem. The results are in the form of fast converging power series. Truncated and regressed expressions are obtained using two and three terms of the expanded series that have maximum relative errors of 0.149% and 0.040%, respectively. The proposed solution is as accurate as existing analytic solutions but is computationally more efficient in estimating the friction head loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it