MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178013428 · doi:10.18280/ria.350309

A Framework for Anomaly Classification Using Deep Transfer Learning Approach

2021· article· en· W3178013428 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruchi Jayaswal, Manish Dixit

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer of learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePreprocessorMachine learningField (mathematics)Anomaly detectionComputer visionComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last few years, surveillance CCTV cameras have rapidly grown to monitor human activities. Suspicious activities like assault, gun violence, kidnapping need to be observed in public places like malls, public roads, colleges, etc. There is a need for such a surveillance system that automatically recognizes human behavior, such as violent and non-violent actions. Action recognition has become an active research topic for researchers within the computer vision field. However, the human behavior recognition community has mainly focused only on regular actions like walking, running, jogging, etc. Though, detecting behavior in anomaly subjects like assault violence, gun violence, or general aggressive behavior has been comparatively less research in these specific events due to a lack of datasets and algorithms. Thus, there is an increasing demand for datasets to develop abnormal behavior algorithms that can classify anomaly actions. In this paper, the novel dataset is proposed named Human Behavior Dataset 2021 (HBD21). There are four categories of videos available in this dataset: Assault violence, Gun violence, Sabotage violence, and Normal events. This proposed dataset contains a total of 456 videos. Each video has the same length of each category. This paper aims to make a robust surveillance system framework with the help of a deep transfer learning approach and proposed a novel hybrid model. In this view, the current research work is categorized into three phases. Firstly, the preprocessing technique is applied to enhance the brightness of videos, and for resizing then, frames are extracted from each video. Secondly, the transfer learning-based Xception model is used to extract relevant features from frames. The third phase is a classification of behaviors in which a modified LSTM technique is applied. The model is trained using LSTM on the HBD21 dataset. Moreover, using proposed methods on the HBD21 dataset, the accuracy is obtained 97.25% overall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207