MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3178554893 · doi:10.1111/jre.12916

Relationship between periodontitis and microangiopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis

2021· review· en· W3178554893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Periodontal Research · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroangiopathyMedicinePeriodontitisOdds ratioInternal medicineMeta-analysisDiabetes mellitusConfidence intervalCochrane LibraryChronic periodontitisType 2 Diabetes MellitusDiabetic nephropathyType 2 diabetesSubgroup analysisDiabetic retinopathyGastroenterologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Whether periodontitis increases the risk of diabetic microangiopathy remains controversial. The present meta-analysis aims to investigate the relationship between periodontitis and diabetic microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang data were searched without language restrictions. The methodological quality of the studies included was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale method, and meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the risk of periodontitis for diabetic microangiopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Thirteen cross-sectional studies, covering 10 570 participants, were included in the present meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that periodontitis was associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetic microangiopathy (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.65-3.56), diabetic retinopathy (OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 2.19-8.55), and diabetic nephropathy (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.07-2.85), while periodontitis was not associated with diabetic neuropathy (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.19-5.12). Subgroup analysis among the studies in Asian (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.94-4.84) and North American (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.08-1.86) populations confirmed the existed association between periodontitis and type 2 diabetic microangiopathy. The relationship still existed in groups with sample size larger than 500 (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.34-2.34) and smaller than 500 (OR: 3.33, 95% CI: 1.38-8.03). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the results by excluding moderate quality studies or removing articles one after the other. CONCLUSION: Current evidences have proved that periodontitis is associated with increased risk of diabetic microangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This conclusion may provide useful evidence for correlated clinical researches. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021247773.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.286
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it