Toward Long-Term FMG Model-Based Estimation of Applied Hand Force in Dynamic Motion During Human–Robot Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) is reliant on human actions and can be addressed by studying human upper-limb motions during interactions. Use of force myography (FMG) signals, which detect muscle contractions, can be useful in developing machine learning algorithms as controls. In this paper, a novel long-term calibrated FMG-based trained model is presented to estimate applied force in dynamic motion during real-time interactions between a human and a linear robot. The proposed FMG-based pHRI framework was investigated in new, unseen, real-time scenarios for the first time. Initially, a long-term reference dataset (multiple source distributions) of upper-limb FMG data was generated as five participants interacted with the robot applying force in five different dynamic motions. Ten other participants interacted with the robot in two intended motions to evaluate the out-of-distribution (OOD) target data (new, unlearned), which was different than the population data. Two practical scenarios were considered for assessment: i) a participant applied force in a new, unlearned motion (scenario 1), and ii) a new, unlearned participant applied force in an intended motion (scenario 2). In each scenario, few long-term FMG-based models were trained using a baseline dataset [reference dataset (scenario 1, 2) and/or a learnt participant dataset (scenario 1)] and a calibration dataset (collected during evaluation). Real-time evaluation showed that the proposed long-term calibrated FMG-based models (LCFMG) could achieve estimation accuracies of 80%-94% in all scenarios. These results are useful towards integrating and generalizing human activity data in a robot control scheme by avoiding extensive HRI training phase in regular applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".