Detection of Mulberry Ripeness Stages Using Deep Learning Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ripeness classification is one of the most challenging tasks in the postharvest management of mulberry fruit. The risks of microbial contamination and human error in manual sorting are significant; it may result in quality degradation and wasting of processed products. Due to advanced developments in computer vision and machine learning, automated sorting became possible. This study presents the results of developing and testing a computer vision-based application using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the classification of mulberry fruit ripening stages. To reduce the training cost and improve the accuracy of classification, transfer learning was used to fine-tune the CNN models. The CNN models in the test include DenseNet, Inception-v3, ResNet-18, ResNet-50, and AlexNet. Transfer learning was used to fine-tune the models and improve the accuracy of classification. The AlexNet and ResNet-18 networks exhibited the best performance with 98.32% and 98.65% overall accuracy for classifying the ripeness of white and black mulberries, respectively. Moreover, the performance of the models did not change when the data sets of both genotypes were mixed. The ResNet-18 was able to classify both genotype and ripeness from 600 fruit images in 2.36 min with an overall accuracy of 98.03%, which was superior to other architectures. It indicates that the model could be used for precise classification of the ripening stages of mulberries and other horticultural products, as a part of an automated sorting system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".