MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3179579281 · doi:10.1002/mop.32974

Deep‐learning‐based nuclear power plant fault detection using remote light‐emitting diode array data transmission

2021· article· en· W3179579281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsData transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)Electronic engineeringFault (geology)Computer scienceNoise (video)DiodeWireless sensor networkDeep learningWirelessEngineeringArtificial intelligenceReal-time computingComputer hardwareElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsImage (mathematics)Computer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper proposes a deep‐learning‐based wireless sensor system that uses an embedded two‐dimensional (2D) light‐emitting diode (LED) array to display measured sensor data and remote data transmission to detect nuclear power plant (NPP) equipment defects. The frequent use of electromagnetic waves often interferes with the operation of NPP. Therefore, we devised a wireless image transmission network using a 2D LED array panel that includes a sensor module and a camera to capture LED array images. Based on the experimental results, the proposed method adopting deep‐learning‐based LED array data extraction produces reliable digital data restoration performance in terms of classification accuracy, even in a complex noise environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it