Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Unsteady Flows With Application to Laminar Flows
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-3028.vid An aerodynamic shape optimization framework for unsteady flow is applied to a range of two- and three-dimensional laminar flows. The shape optimization framework uses free-form deformation for geometry control with an underlying B-spline surface parameterization integrated with an efficient mesh deformation method. The mesh deformation is based on the linear elasticity method applied to a B-spline control volume parameterization of the mesh. A parallel implicit Newton-Krylov algorithm is used to solve the discretized flow equations and the discrete adjoint methodology is applied to both the flow and the mesh-movement algorithms to compute the gradient. For the two-dimensional studies, we consider three objectives based on the mean aerodynamic quantities: lift-constrained drag minimization, lift-to-drag ratio maximization, and lift maximization. For the drag minimization and lift-to-drag ratio maximization problems, the optimizer improved the performance of the baseline airfoil primarily by keeping the flow on the upper surface attached as long as possible and also pushing the camber towards the trailing edge to increase or maintain the lift coefficient. The optimizer improved the drag minimization objective by more than 20% and the lift-to-drag ratio maximization objective by about 50% for roughly the same initial drag. We also investigate the impact of design variable scaling on the convergence of the lift-maximization problem. For the three-dimensional studies, we consider a minimization of mean drag at a fixed mean lift, and we allow section shape, aerodynamic twist about the quarter-chord, and the chord length to vary along the span of the wing. The optimizer exploits all of the geometric freedom given to improve the design objective while satisfying the constraints imposed and produces some non-intuitive geometric changes, especially with respect to the wing planform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it