MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184008549 · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ac1848

A numerical study of the effect of the thickness parameter on machining distortion for aluminum alloy plates

2021· article· en· W3184008549 on OpenAlexaff
Alejandro E. Rodríguez‐Sánchez, ELIAS RIGOBERTO LEDESMA OROZCO, Leonardo Barcenas

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Research Express · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistortion (music)MachiningResidual stressMaterials scienceFinite element methodStructural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)AluminiumPosition (finance)Composite materialEngineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The deformation produced after the machining of a structural component is known as part distortion. This phenomenon is a consequence of the inherent residual stresses that exist in raw materials. In this study, such phenomenon is numerically investigated in simple plate elements by considering their thicknesses and their corresponding contribution to part distortion. A total number of eleven flat plates were analyzed using a numerical part distortion procedure for finite element models that also considered their machining positions. The results of this study show that part distortion has more impact on slender plates because these present higher loads than thicker plates in which the residual stresses self-balance throughout their section. Consequently, the part distortion phenomena in simple structural flat plates are related the plate thickness, their machining position, and geometrical parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Research ExpressSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207