MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184047652 · doi:10.1533/ijcr.2005.0329

Cervical muscle response to trunk flexion in whiplash-type right lateral impacts

2005· article· en· W3184047652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Crashworthiness · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrunkWhiplashElectromyographyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineMotor unit recruitmentAnatomyKinematicsMuscle contractionPoison controlPhysical therapyPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the electromyogram response of the cervical muscles to a right lateral impact when the trunk is flexed. Twenty healthy volunteers were subjected to right lateral impacts of 4.1, 8.0, 11.1, and 13.3 m/s2, and were seated ȁout-of-positionȁ with the trunk flexed forward by 45 degrees and also either right or left laterally by 45 degrees. Muscle responses were of low magnitude, all muscles generating less than 39% of their maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram. The splenius capitis muscle contralateral to the impact direction showed a greater EMG response than its counterpart. Electromyographic and kinematic variables showed trends towards being affected by the levels of acceleration. Time to onset of the electromyogram for the muscles decreased with increasing levels of acceleration. Overall, a right lateral impact with subjects ȁout-of-positionȁ reduces the muscle activity and perhaps the risk of muscle injury as compared to when subjects are in neutral (driving) posture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it