A Morphology-Based Adaptively Spatio-Temporal Merging Algorithm for Optimally Combining Multisource Gridded Precipitation Products With Various Resolutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gridded precipitation products with fine resolutions and qualities are of great importance for understanding the global water–carbon-energy cycles at various spatiotemporal scales. Though continuous developments in Satellite Remote Sensing fields have been providing great strengths for measuring the precipitation from space, merging precipitation products from different sources, especially the gauge observations, is still the optimal way for obtaining high-quality precipitation data. Currently, the mainstream merging methods mainly focus on merging the rain rates without the considerations of rain events. In this study, we propose a new assumption that both rain events and rain rates should be considered in the merging procedures rather than only the rain rates. To meet our assumption, a morphology-based adaptive spatio-temporal merging algorithm (MASTMA) for combining various precipitation products is proposed, in which the morphology theory is first introduced to comprehensively consider the influences from both rain events and rain rates. The multisource and multiscale precipitation products including the gauge-based data (CPC-U, 0.5°, daily), the satellite-based data [Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation by Moving Vector with Kalman (GSMaP-MVK), 0.1°, hourly; integrated multisatellite retrievals for global precipitation measurement late run (IMERG-LR), 0.1°, half-hourly], and the reanalysis data (ERA5-land, 0.1°, hourly), have been comprehensively considered in MASTMA for generating the final estimates (MASTMA-F, 0.1°, hourly) over the southeastern regions of the Mainland China in the periods from 2016 to 2019. The main conclusions include but are not limited to: 1) considerations on rain events contribute significantly to the final merged results, especially when eliminating false extreme values over the regions where precipitation is greatly overestimated; 2) the MASTMA could optimally integrate the advantages from multisource precipitation products with different resolutions, particularly from the perspective of the spatial distributions; and 3) the final merged estimates using MASTMA outperform the contemporary state-of-the-art precipitation products especially in terms of modified Kling–Gupta Efficiency (mKGE) and critical success index (CSI). Additionally, the results of this study suggest that MASMTA is a new promising merging approach with great robustness and applicability, and has the foreseeable potentials for the operational run to generate the optimal global merged precipitation products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".