Plastic Legacies: Pollution, Persistence, and Politics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Chapter 11, "Plastics Talk/Talking Plastics: The Communicative Power of Plasticity," Deirdre McKay and her colleagues outline insights gleaned from two action research projects conducted in the Philippines and United Kingdom.They explore how plastics communicate important messages about class, gender, and identity formation of the subaltern.The authors outline how global attempts to respond to plastics pollution often neglect the socio-cultural differences between social groups, the important messages that plastics "speak" to us about including gender and Indigenous politics, and the cultural subversion of global waste.The authors emphasize that we need to learn to be attentive to the messages that plastics communicate if we are to respond to plastics pollution in empowering and meaningful ways.Chapter 12, the final chapter, from Trisia Farrelly, Ian Shaw, and John Holland, is entitled "Redressing the Faustian Bargains of Plastics Economies."The chapter outlines the need for a legally binding international treaty on plastics pollution based on the successes of the Montral Protocol on chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other ozone-depleting substances.The authors emphasize that such a global instrument must focus on prevention and the full life cycle of plastics from extraction to recovery of legacy plastics.The chapter foregrounds the hazardous, ambiguous, and unpredictable nature of plastics' physical, toxic, and biological entanglements and consequently argues that legislation should focus on preventing
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it