Random Access with and without Sensing in Non-Terrestrial Networks for Timely Updates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing boom in time-critical applications such as remote sensing and monitoring has made low latency of information an important requirement. Age of information (AoI) has been proposed to measure the freshness of information from the receiver side. In this paper, we analyze that multiple sources transmit their status packets to a remote controller for timely updates. Characterized by long transmission distances, satellite networks are commonly using Aloha as a random access protocol by preconceiving channel sensing is low efficient. Yet, for some non-terrestrial networks where the propagation delay is comparable to the transmission time, the performance comparison between Aloha and CSMA requires more detailed consideration. By building the node-centric discrete-time Markov chain, we quantify the performance of Aloha and CSMA on AoI and give the performance break-even point. Only when the ratio of propagation delay to transmission time is larger than this point, Aloha performs better on the timeliness metric. Furthermore, we derive the optimal attempt probability of CSMA to achieve the lowest latency. In the end, simulation results confirmed the validity of the theoretical analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it