MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187977197 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500930

Random Access with and without Sensing in Non-Terrestrial Networks for Timely Updates

2021· article· en· W3187977197 on OpenAlexaff
Yuchen Wu, Shaohua Wu, Lingyan Zhang, Jian Jiao, Ning Zhang, Qinyu Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersResearch and DevelopmentNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAlohaComputer scienceComputer networkRandom accessNetwork packetMarkov chainPerformance metricTransmission (telecommunications)Latency (audio)Real-time computingPropagation delayMetric (unit)Stochastic geometryWirelessThroughputTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing boom in time-critical applications such as remote sensing and monitoring has made low latency of information an important requirement. Age of information (AoI) has been proposed to measure the freshness of information from the receiver side. In this paper, we analyze that multiple sources transmit their status packets to a remote controller for timely updates. Characterized by long transmission distances, satellite networks are commonly using Aloha as a random access protocol by preconceiving channel sensing is low efficient. Yet, for some non-terrestrial networks where the propagation delay is comparable to the transmission time, the performance comparison between Aloha and CSMA requires more detailed consideration. By building the node-centric discrete-time Markov chain, we quantify the performance of Aloha and CSMA on AoI and give the performance break-even point. Only when the ratio of propagation delay to transmission time is larger than this point, Aloha performs better on the timeliness metric. Furthermore, we derive the optimal attempt probability of CSMA to achieve the lowest latency. In the end, simulation results confirmed the validity of the theoretical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207