MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189111293 · doi:10.1515/stat-2022-0111

On the boundary properties of Bernstein estimators on the simplex

2022· preprint· en· W3189111293 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Statistics · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimplexEstimatorComplement (music)MathematicsBoundary (topology)Domain (mathematical analysis)Variance (accounting)Simplex algorithmApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisStatisticsMathematical optimizationCombinatoricsLinear programming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we study the asymptotic properties (bias, variance, mean squared error) of Bernstein estimators for cumulative distribution functions and density functions near and on the boundary of the d- dimensional simplex. Our results generalize those found by Leblanc (2012b), who treated the case d = 1, and complement the results from Ouimet (2021a) in the interior of the simplex. Since the “edges” of the d- dimensional simplex have dimensions going from 0 (vertices) up to d − 1 (facets) and our kernel function is multinomial, the asymptotic expressions for the bias, variance and mean squared error are not straightforward extensions of one-dimensional asymptotics as they would be for product-type estimators studied by almost all past authors in the context of Bernstein estimators or asymmetric kernel estimators. This point makes the mathematical analysis much more interesting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.296
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it