Graph-Based Namespaces and Load Sharing for Efficient Information Dissemination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graph-based namespaces are being increasingly used to represent the organization of complex and ever-growing information eco-systems and individual user roles. Timely and accurate information dissemination requires an architecture with appropriate naming frameworks, adaptable to changing roles, focused on content rather than network addresses. Today’s complex information organization structures make such dissemination very challenging. To address this, we propose POISE, a name-based publish/subscribe architecture for efficient topic-based and recipient-based content dissemination. POISE proposes an information layer, improving on state-of-the-art Information-Centric Networking solutions in two major ways: 1) support for complex graph-based namespaces, and 2) automatic name-based load-splitting. POISE supports in-network graph-based naming, leveraged in a dissemination protocol which exploits information layer rendezvous points (RPs) that perform name expansions. For improved robustness and scalability, POISE supports adaptive load-sharing via multiple RPs, each managing a dynamically chosen subset of the namespace graph. Excessive workload may cause one RP to turn into a “hot spot”, impeding performance and reliability. To eliminate such traffic concentration, we propose an automated load-splitting mechanism, consisting of an enhanced, namespace graph partitioning complemented by a seamless, loss-less core migration procedure. Due to the nature of our graph partitioning and its complex objectives, off-the-shelf graph partitioning, e.g., METIS, is inadequate. We propose a hybrid, iterative bi-partitioning solution, consisting of an initial and a refinement phase. We also implemented POISE on a DPDK-based platform. Using the important application of emergency response, our experimental results show that POISE outperforms state-of-the-art solutions, demonstrating its effectiveness in timely delivery and load-sharing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".