An Incremental Boolean Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human-oriented and machine-generated data in cyber-physical-social systems are often complicated graph-structured. Graph-powered learning methods are conducive to discovering valuable knowledge from large-scale graph data and improving decision-making processes. However, due to the neglect of diverse relations among things, most existing knowledge reasoning studies are inherently flawed and inefficient in processing the heterogeneous graphs with high-order connectivity. Tensor, as a powerful and effective tool to model high-level semantic interactions between various things, can provide high-order Internet of things graph with new perspectives and possibilities. Therefore, this article innovatively proposes a collaborative artificial intelligence of things data analysis and application framework based on Boolean tensors, which supports the expression and fusion of heterogeneous graph and ultimately promotes the AI processing. In this context, we focus on developing an incremental Boolean tensor factorization (IBTF) approach for efficient knowledge reasoning to meet the requirements of real-time and high-level quality demands for intelligent services. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to do this work. More concretely, we present factors update and binary features merge algorithms for the integrated graph tensors to avoid numerous repeated calculations of historical data. Experimental results on general synthetic datasets demonstrate that the IBTF approach proposed in this article guarantees nearly equal approximate accuracy while reducing execution time by dozens and even more of times. Furthermore, experimental evaluations and interpretability analysis on real-world datasets verify the practicality of the proposed framework and approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".