An Incremental Boolean Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence of Things
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human-oriented and machine-generated data in cyber-physical-social systems are often complicated graph-structured. Graph-powered learning methods are conducive to discovering valuable knowledge from large-scale graph data and improving decision-making processes. However, due to the neglect of diverse relations among things, most existing knowledge reasoning studies are inherently flawed and inefficient in processing the heterogeneous graphs with high-order connectivity. Tensor, as a powerful and effective tool to model high-level semantic interactions between various things, can provide high-order Internet of things graph with new perspectives and possibilities. Therefore, this article innovatively proposes a collaborative artificial intelligence of things data analysis and application framework based on Boolean tensors, which supports the expression and fusion of heterogeneous graph and ultimately promotes the AI processing. In this context, we focus on developing an incremental Boolean tensor factorization (IBTF) approach for efficient knowledge reasoning to meet the requirements of real-time and high-level quality demands for intelligent services. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to do this work. More concretely, we present factors update and binary features merge algorithms for the integrated graph tensors to avoid numerous repeated calculations of historical data. Experimental results on general synthetic datasets demonstrate that the IBTF approach proposed in this article guarantees nearly equal approximate accuracy while reducing execution time by dozens and even more of times. Furthermore, experimental evaluations and interpretability analysis on real-world datasets verify the practicality of the proposed framework and approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it