MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191295849 · doi:10.1093/frebul/ktab009

Undoing Realism: Reclaiming the Garden of Eden in George Sand’s <i>Isidora</i> (1845)

2021· article· en· W3191295849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies Bulletin · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)UndoingPhilosophyArtAppropriationArt historyGarden of EdenRealismTheologyLiteratureHumanitiesPsychoanalysisPsychologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

George Sand’s idealist novel Isidora (1845) can be read, I argue, as a feminist re-writing of the Biblical Fall and the Garden of Eden.1 In Pouvoirs de l’horreur (1980), Julia Kristeva notes that ‘le récit de la chute met en scène une altérité diabolique par rapport au divin’.2 It is specifically a covetous desire for woman which Kristeva states as rupturing the divine in paradise, as Adam is torn apart by temptation: ‘Adam n’a plus la calme nature de l’homme paradisiaque, il est déchiré par la convoitise: désir de la femme.’3 Thus, whilst sin can be interpreted as being brought into the world by both Adam and Eve, ‘sa racine et sa représentation fondamentale n’est autre que la tentation féminine’.4 Although Kristeva does not mention the textual re-appropriation of this strand of theological thinking within literary contexts, the textual equation of woman, sin and desire is...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it