Environmental Sound Classification via Time–Frequency Attention and Framewise Self-Attention-Based Deep Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental sound classification (ESC) is crucial to understanding the surroundings in Internet of Things (IoT) applications. The state-of-the-art deep learning approaches do not have good ESC performance when there exists various clutter interference, which is common in IoT scenarios. In this article, we present a novel deep neural network framework based on time–frequency attention and framewise self-attention (TFFS-DNN). It consists of two major novel architectures: 1) gradient and 2) latent feature-based DNN to generate our time–frequency attention, which can locate the relevant time–frequency (i.e., spectral) features accurately, and self-attention normalization DNN to generate our framewise self-attentions which properly indicate the relevance of frames. By conjoining these two sorts of distinct and complementary attentions with spectrograms, we are able to identify the importance or relevance in terms of time, frequency, and frame of the sounds using TFFS-DNN, which helps in distinguishing clutter such as background as well as model interpretation to some extent. Thus, the proposed TFFS-DNN can classify environmental sounds with clutter. The evaluation using four real-world environmental sound data sets demonstrates the superior performance of the proposed framework over several state-of-the-art schemes. Notably, we achieve 79.23% classification accuracy on theUrbanSounddata set, a raw environmental sound data set that is full of clutter. The ablation study demonstrates a relative 3%–9% improvement of classification accuracy by the proposed framework over the baseline deep model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".