MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191538187 · doi:10.1080/10402004.2021.1958966

Power Loss Estimation and Thermal Analysis of an Aero-Engine Cylindrical Roller Bearing

2021· article· en· W3191538187 on OpenAlexaff
Rami Kerrouche, Azzedine Dadouche, Mahmoud Mamou, S. Boukraa

Bibliographic record

VenueTribology Transactions · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Parametric statisticsRolling-element bearingRotational speedPower (physics)Mechanical engineeringContext (archaeology)ThermalFinite element methodEngineeringComputer simulationMechanicsStructural engineeringComputer scienceAcousticsSimulationVibrationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-speed rolling element bearings for aircraft engines are custom-made components and operate under high temperature conditions owing to the elevated rotational speeds and loads. Therefore, assessing the various heat generation sources and mechanisms is worth investigating to accurately quantify the overall power loss within the bearing. In this context, a numerical parametric study was performed to determine and locate various power losses inside an aero-engine cylindrical roller bearing. Then, a thermal network model based on Ohm’s law was developed to estimate the operating temperatures of the bearing elements. A series of experiments was carried out on a high-speed rolling element bearing test rig to validate the numerical predictions, such as bearing component temperatures and overall power loss at specific operating conditions. The numerical predictions based on a hybrid approach showed good agreement with the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTribology TransactionsSame topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207