MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191538187 · doi:10.1080/10402004.2021.1958966

Power Loss Estimation and Thermal Analysis of an Aero-Engine Cylindrical Roller Bearing

2021· article· en· W3191538187 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTribology Transactions · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Parametric statisticsRolling-element bearingRotational speedPower (physics)Mechanical engineeringContext (archaeology)ThermalFinite element methodEngineeringComputer simulationMechanicsStructural engineeringComputer scienceAcousticsSimulationVibrationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-speed rolling element bearings for aircraft engines are custom-made components and operate under high temperature conditions owing to the elevated rotational speeds and loads. Therefore, assessing the various heat generation sources and mechanisms is worth investigating to accurately quantify the overall power loss within the bearing. In this context, a numerical parametric study was performed to determine and locate various power losses inside an aero-engine cylindrical roller bearing. Then, a thermal network model based on Ohm’s law was developed to estimate the operating temperatures of the bearing elements. A series of experiments was carried out on a high-speed rolling element bearing test rig to validate the numerical predictions, such as bearing component temperatures and overall power loss at specific operating conditions. The numerical predictions based on a hybrid approach showed good agreement with the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it