MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191656955 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500370

Simple and Efficient Algorithm for Drone Path Planning

2021· article· en· W3191656955 on OpenAlexaff
Fu Chi Chen, Gopi Gugan, Roberto Solis-Oba, Anwar Haque

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDroneMotion planningComputer scienceSoftware deploymentPath (computing)Travelling salesman problemComputationMetric (unit)Energy consumptionReal-time computingTask (project management)Simple (philosophy)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceEngineeringRobotComputer networkOperations managementSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, have gained a lot of popularity due to their large number of applications in surveillance, aerial photography, 3D mapping, search and rescue operations, and shipping and delivery of goods. A critical task in the deployment of drones is the computation of effective flying paths that allow drones to reach their destinations while avoiding obstacles and minimizing the amount of energy that they need to consume. We present a novel path planning algorithm that is not only faster and uses less memory than other existing path planning algorithms, but it also produces shorter paths. All these performance metric improvements lead to a more energy efficient path planning algorithm for autonomous drones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207