MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192565777 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnab212

Monotonicity Formula and Classification of Stable Solutions to Polyharmonic Lane–Emden Equations

2021· article· en· W3192565777 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsMonotonic functionExponentOrder (exchange)Compact spaceElliptic curvePure mathematicsSet (abstract data type)Mathematical analysisCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we consider polyharmonic Lane–Emden equations $$ \begin{equation*} (-\Delta )^m u=|u|^{p-1}u, \ \ \ \mbox{in} \ \ \ {\mathbb R}^n, \end{equation*}$$where $m\geq 3$. We classify the stable or stable outside a compact set solutions when $m=3$ or $4$ for any dimensions and when $m\geq 5$ for large dimensions. In the process, we exhibit the general Joseph–Lundgren exponent (including both local and nonlocal cases) in a concise form and prove related properties. The key ingredient of the proof of the classification is a monotonicity formula for general polyharmonic equations, which may have application in regularity theory for higher-order elliptic equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.359
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it