MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W319306260

The Aftermath of Slavery: Transitions and Transformations in Southeastern Nigeria

2008· article· en· W319306260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saheed Aderinto

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pan-African Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaHistoriographyPoliticsSubject (documents)Atlantic WorldHistoryAtlantic slave tradePerspective (graphical)Value (mathematics)Index (typography)GeographyPolitical scienceEconomic historyLawAncient historyArchaeologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chima Korieh and Femi J. Kolapo eds., The Aftermath of Slavery: Transitions and Transformations in Southeastern Nigeria (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2007). iv + 261pp. Maps, pictures, tables, index. The abolition of the trans-Atlantic slave trade produced far- reaching political, social and economic consequences in Europe, Africa and the New World. And scholars have done considerably well in examining this aspect of world history. A close look at the large and growing body of literature on this subject indicates that more studies have to be conducted on the impact of the abolition on specific regions of the three continents - especially in Africa. In other words, research agendas that favor the examination of the subject in specific parts of the continents is capable of enhancing better knowledge of the effects of the abolition of the trans- Atlantic slave trade from a micro- study perspective. The Aftermath of Slavery, a ten-chapter volume edited by Chima Korieh (Marquette University) and Femi J. Kolapo (University of Guelph) fills this yarning gap in the historiography of African history, African Diaspora history and Pan-African Studies. Thus both specialist and nonspecialist readers will find the data and arguments of the contributors helpful in understanding the impact of the abolition of the trans-Atlantic slave trade on the peoples of modern southeastern Nigeria. Instructively, Korieh and Kolapo add value to the content of the book as they conduct a nuance review of existing literature on abolition of the slave trade in Africa at large. This exercise helps to adequately locate the contribution of this book to scholarship while creating an easy and digestible argument and narrative for readers who want a jumpstart on this huge and expanding field. In chapter one Waibinte Wariboko parades a large body of useful archival materials to explicate how the abolition of the trans-Atlantic slave trade introduced new forms of tension between African middlemen and the rulers on the one hand and British traders and consuls on the other. To be sure, the new pattern of relations between and among Africans and Europeans, which culminated into the collapse of indigenous political authority in this part of modern Nigeria, represents one of the numerous phases of Africa's interactions with the wider world. And the creative ingenuity of Africans as Wariboko has shown reflected in the ways they responded to the introduction of palm oil and other articles of trade generally christened as legitimate commerce. In his chapter, Korieh examines the implications of the transition on gender relations, arguing that: While the political and economic impacts of the transition have received significant treatment in the literature, several social formations that followed in the wake of the transition such as the implication for gender relations have not (p. 42). Korieh is able to show that women like men were active participants in the new forms of social and political relations of the period. U.D. Anyanwu identifies the inadequate scholarly attention given to the demographic impact of the abolition and thus examines two settlement patterns, which emerged as a result of the abolition of the trans-Atlantic slave trade in southeastern Nigeria. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Pan-African StudiesSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207