Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Buckwheat, an important crop in some regions of the world, is not taxonomically related to wheat. Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) is grown in Asian countries such as China, Japan, Korea, Nepal, and Bhutan (1). There is also a traditional use of buckwheat dishes in Russia and Europe, and large-scale cultivation for the Japanese market in Canada and the USA. Tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum) is grown in some parts of China (2, 3). Buckwheat allergy is an IgE-mediated immediate-type reaction, sometimes causing severe reactions similar to those caused by soybean and peanut allergy (1). The allergic reaction can follow ingestion of buckwheat (4), occupational exposure (5), or domestic exposure through sleeping on a pillow stuffed with buckwheat husk (6). In 1909, Smith wrote the first scientific report on buckwheat allergy, concerning a young patient whose asthma, allergic rhinitis, urticaria, and angioeodema were provoked by ingestion of small amounts of buckwheat flour (7). In this issue of Allergy, three cases of nocturnal asthma in Korean children are described, the cause being buckwheat chaff pillows (8). These pillows are traditionally used in Japan and Korea for health and comfort. Recently, their popularity in Europe and North America has increased, and buckwheat pillows are now regularly marketed and advertised on television. There is a lack of information on the prevalence of buckwheat allergy in the population of most countries, except Japan. In the 1960s, Nakamura & Yamaguchi identified 169 cases of buckwheat allergy in a national survey of Japanese hospital patients (9). Most (86%) were young children, and both food allergy and respiratory allergy were found. The most common reaction was buckwheat asthma (82%), and in 18 cases (11%) anaphylactic shock had occurred. The largest study on buckwheat allergy was performed in 92680 schoolchildren in Yokohama, in the 1990s (10). In total, 140 boys and 54 girls (0.22% of all children) had buckwheat allergy. The most common reactions among sensitized children were urticaria (37.3%), wheezing (26.5%), and anaphylactic shock (3.9%). The average consumption of buckwheat is low in Europe and North America, but high in some subgroups of the society. Buckwheat does not contain gluten, and is a common supplement for patients with celiac disease. We have noticed adverse reactions among members of a society for gluten-sensitive patients. In those with celiac disease combined with other food allergies, 30% reported buckwheat intolerance, while buckwheat intolerance was rare (1%) among those with gluten intolerance only. Some subjects had specific IgE antibodies against buckwheat (RAST), and one sensitized patient had fewer stomach symptoms after avoiding buckwheat (11). Cases of occupational buckwheat asthma have been reported from noodle shops in Japan (12), Korea (13), Spain (4), and France (14), and a health food shop in Switzerland (15). In the USA (16), a woman suffered anaphylaxis after eating buckwheat crepes. She had been sensitized 4 years earlier when working in a factory making buckwheat husk pillows. In Sweden, 46% of 28 workers repackaging health food had symptoms (asthma, rhinitis, and skin eruptions) when handling buckwheat, and 28% were sensitized to buckwheat (5). In a study from China, only one out of 61 subjects (2%) with either occupational exposure or frequent consumption of buckwheat had a positive skin prick test to buckwheat (3). Different allergens have been identified in common buckwheat, and since buckwheat allergens are thermostable, they remain after cooking (1, 2). A Japanese study showed that a 24-kDa buckwheat protein (BW24KD) was the most frequently recognized allergenic component, binding to IgE antibodies from 100% of the patients' sera (17). Recent studies have verified that BW24KD is the main allergen in common buckwheat, but other buckwheat allergens (19, 16, and 9 kDa) may be of importance (18). A 24-kDa protein has been identified and purified also in Tartary buckwheat, but it is not clear whether it is identical to BW24KD (2). Clinically relevant cross-reactivity has been demonstrated for latex (19, 20). Buckwheat allergy can occur in different situations, even in countries with little average consumption of buckwheat dishes and little awareness of this type of allergy. It is mostly a “pure” IgE-mediated reaction, and suspected cases can easily be verified by skin prick tests or RAST. Buckwheat is a food allergen, an occupational allergen, and the current paper in Allergy (8) demonstrates that it may also be a hidden domestic allergen. Earlier studies have shown that a large proportion of allergic patients are children. Hospital records indicate that buckwheat allergy is not common, but severe reactions may occur in sensitized subjects, including asthma attacks or anaphylactic shock. Reported cross-reactivity with latex allergens deserves further attention. In exposed workplaces, good occupational hygiene and use of respiratory protection devices should be considered. Finally, for estimation of the risk of buckwheat allergy, epidemiologic studies are needed, particularly in subgroups with a high consumption of buckwheat food or use of buckwheat husk pillows. G. Wieslander, D. Norbäck Department of Medical Sciences/Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it