Order picking optimization with rack-moving mobile robots and multiple workstations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study an automated warehousing system, where racks are moved by robots to multiple workstations so that pickers at each workstation can retrieve the products from the racks to fill up the orders. In this context, the order and rack sequences should be considered simultaneously and the workload balance and rack conflicts among multiple workstations should also be taken into considerations. However, these factors have not been addressed in the current literature. To fill this gap, we formulate a comprehensive multi-workstation order and rack sequencing problem as a mixed integer programming model that accounts for workload balancing and rack conflicts. To solve the model, we propose an adaptive large neighborhood search method, which builds on a newly developed data-driven heuristic that exploits the structure of the problem and simulated annealing. We show that our proposed approach performs well on both small-scale problem instances with synthetic data and a large-scale real-world dataset supplied by a large e-commerce company. In the latter case, it can save up to 62% in rack movements compared to the company’s current practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it