MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194908107 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100726

Depletion of nuclear LINE1 RNA in mouse ESCs and embryos

2021· article· en· W3194908107 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Percharde, Chih-Jen Lin, Miguel Ramalho‐Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthUK Research and InnovationRoyal Society of EdinburghScottish Government
KeywordsBiologyEmbryoCell biologyMicroinjectionEmbryonic stem cellRetrotransposonZygoteGene knockdownPolyadenylationRNAEmbryogenesisGeneticsCell cultureGeneTransposable elementMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LINE1 is the most active and abundant family of retrotransposons; it is implicated in a number of pathologies, as well as in early embryo development. We present a protocol to specifically knockdown LINE1 in mouse embryonic stem cells and embryos, including details for the nucleofection and zygote microinjection of LINE antisense oligos, followed by RNA FISH validation. This protocol can be used in development, as well as other cell types where LINE1 is believed to be expressed. For complete information on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Percharde et al. (2018).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207