MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196121166 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3107430

Deep Learning (DL) Based Joint Resource Allocation and RRH Association in 5G-Multi-Tier Networks

2021· article· en· W3196121166 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersSejong University
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceResource allocationArtificial neural networkResource management (computing)FemtocellDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceComputer networkAssociation schemeDeep learningCloud computingAssociation (psychology)Base station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fifth-Generation (5G) networks have adopted a multi-tier structural model which includes femtocells, picocells, and macrocells to ensure the user quality-of-service (QoS). To meet these QoS demands, the system requires optimization of different resources in different network dynamics carefully. However, if ignored, this will lead to long processing delays and high computational burdens. To avoid this, we proposed Deep Learning (DL) based resource allocation (RA) as a promising solution to meet the network requirements. DL is an effective mechanism where neural networks can learn to develop RA techniques. Thus, an optimized RA decision can be achieved using DL without exhaustive computations. Further, DL uses DL to achieve solutions for joint RA and remote-radio-head (RRH) association problems in multi-tier Cloud-Radio Access Networks (C-RAN). Initially, a summary of existing literature on DL-based RA techniques is provided, followed by a deep neural network (DNN) description, its architectures, and the data training method. Then, a supervised DL technique is presented to solve the joint RA and RRH-association problem. An efficient subchannel assignment, power allocation, and RRH-association (SAPARA) technique are used to generate the training data for the DNN model using the iterative approach where the seed data for the SAPARA technique is taken using a uniform power allocation and path-loss based association (UPA-PLBA) model. After training the DNN model, the accurateness of the presented model is tested. Simulation outcomes demonstrate that our proposed scheme is capable of providing an efficient solution in the considered scenario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it