MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196539109 · doi:10.33633/aiej.v5i1.3282

Implementasi Integer Programming dengan Algoritma Branch and Bound Menggunakan QM for Windows dalam Memaksimalkan Keuntungan di PT XYZ

2021· article· en· W3196539109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Industrial Engineering Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteger programmingProduction (economics)Integer (computer science)Computer scienceAlgorithmOperating systemEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractIn maximizing the profits to be obtained the company needs optimal production planning. The plan considers the resources of the company. PT XYZ is a furniture company. This research focuses on optimizing production planning on the manufacture of door products at PT. XYZ. There are several types of products issued in: D1 type door, D2 type door, D3 type door, and D4 type door. Production planning at PT. XYZ can be seen as an integer program model, which is a method related to optimizing resources to increase profits. Optimization is done by determining the amount of production for each type and each calculating existing resources. The solution search for this model is done by the Branch and Bound algorithm. Based on the calculation results using QM software for Windows, the amount corresponding to production is obtained by using Branches and Bound giving an increase of 36.5% compared to the acquisition of PT. XYZ before. Keywords: Branch and Bound Algorithms, Integer Programming,Optimization AbstrakDalam memaksimalkan keuntungan yang akan diperoleh perusahaan perlu adanya perencanaan produksi yang optimal. Perencanaan tersebut mempertimbangkan ketersediaan sumber daya pada perusahaan. PT XYZ merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang furniture. Penelitian ini fokus kepada pengoptimalan perencanaan produksi pada pembuatan produk pintu di PT.XYZ. Terdapat beberapa jenis produk yang diproduksi di antaranya: Pintu tipe D1, Pintu tipe D2, Pintu tipe D3, dan Pintu tipe D4. Perencanaan produksi di PT.XYZ ini dapat dikatakan sebagai model program integer, karena semua variabel menghendaki hasilnya berupa bilangan bulat. Program tersebut berhubungan dengan pengoptimalan ketersediaan sumber daya bertujuan untuk memaksimalkan keuntungan. Pengoptimalan yang dilakukan yaitu dengan menentukan jumlah produksi untuk masing-masing tipe serta mempertimbangkan semua ketersediaan sumber daya yang ada. Pencarian solusi untuk model ini dilakukan dengan algoritma Branch and Bound. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan menggunakan software QM for Windows, diketahui bahwa penentuan jumlah produksi dengan menggunakan algoritma Branch and Bound memberikan peningkatan keuntungan sebesar 36.5% dibandingkan dengan keuntungan PT.XYZ sebelumnya. Kata kunci: Optimasi, program integer, algoritma Branch and BoundReferensi[1] Sofyan Assauri. Manajemen Produksi dan Operasi. Lembaga Penerbit FakultasEkonomi Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta. 2008.[2] Winston, W. L. Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms. Edisi Keempat.Canada: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning. 2004.[3] Akram, S. A., dan Jaya, A. I. Optimalisasi Produksi Roti dengan Menggunakan Metode Branch and Bound (Studi Kasus Pada Pabrik Roti Syariah Bakery, Jl. Maleo, Lrg.VIII No. 68 Palu). Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Terapan, 13(2): 98-107. 2016.[4] Jiao, H. W., dkk. An Effective Branch and Bound Algorithm for MinimaxLinear Fractional Programming. Journal of Applied Mathematics, Volume 2014: 8. 2014.[5] Williams, H. P. The Problem with Integer Programming. Journal of Management Mathematics, 22(3): 213-230. 2011.[6] Falani, I. Penentuan Nilai Parameter Metode Exponential Smoothing dengan Algoritma Genetik dalam Meningkatkan Akurasi Forecasting. Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science, 3(1): 14–16. 2018.[7] Mehdizadeh, E., dan Jalili, S. An Algorithm Based on Theory of Constraints and Branch and Bound for Solving Integrated Product-Mix-Outsourcing Problem. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 12(1): 167-172. 2019.[8] Taylor, B. W. Introduction to Management Science. Edisi ke-11. United States of America: Prentice-Hall International, INC. 2013[9] Puryani., dan Ristono, A. Penelitian Operasional. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. 2012.[10] Yusrah N. dkk. Implementasi Algoritma Branch and Bound Dalam Penentuan Jumlah Produksi Untuk Memaksimalkan Keuntungan. Jurnal String Vol. 3 No. 1 Agustus 2018. ISSN: 2527-9661[11] Taha, H. A. Operations Research: An Introduction. Edisi ke-8. United States of America: Prentice-Hall International, INC. 2007.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it