MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Fundamental Basis of Palpitations: A Neurocardiology Approach

2021· review· en· W3196966781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Cardiology Reviews · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalpitationsMedicineNeuroscienceInsulaCardiologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Palpitations are a common symptom that may indicate cardiac arrhythmias, be a somatic complaint in anxiety disorders, and can be present in patients without either condition. The objective of this review was to explore the pathways and fundamental mechanisms through which individuals appreciate palpitations. OBSERVATIONS: Cardiac afferents provide beat-to-beat sensory information on the heart to the spinal cord, brain stem, and higher brain centers. Cardioception, a subset of interoception ('the physiological sense of the condition of the body'), refers to sensing of the heartbeat. High cardioception is present in persons with lower body mass index, lower percentages of body fat, and anxiety disorders. Low cardioception (lower interoceptive awareness) is associated with psychiatric disorders, such as depression, personality disorders, and schizophrenia. CNS sites associated with heartbeat detection have been identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging studies and heartbeat-evoked electroencephalogram potentials. The right insula, cingulate gyrus, somatomotor and somatosensory cortices nucleus accumbens, left subthalamic nucleus, and left ventral capsule/striatum are implicated in both palpitations and heartbeat detection. Involvement of the brain as a primary modulator of palpitations rests on the data that various areas of the brain are activated in association with cardioception, the ability of focal brain stimulation to induce palpitations, the ability of central alpha receptor agonists and antagonists to modulate palpitations, and suppression of palpitations by transcranial repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS). CONCLUSIONS: Palpitations should be viewed as a pathway extending from the heart to the brain. Palpitations are, in part, a reflection of an individual's cardioception awareness, which is modulated by body size, percentage of body fat, and psychological or psychiatric conditions. Palpitations can originate in the brain and involve central neurotransmitters. Treatment of palpitations unrelated to cardiac arrhythmias or anxiety disorders should consider the use of central alpha-2 agonists and possibly rTMS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it