MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197259717 · doi:10.3390/met11091373

A Review on Capturing Twin Nucleation in Crystal Plasticity for Hexagonal Metals

2021· review· en· W3197259717 on OpenAlexaff
YubRaj Paudel, Deepesh Giri, Matthew W. Priddy, Christopher D. Barrett, Kaan Inal, Mark A. Tschopp, Hongjoo Rhee, Haitham El Kadiri

Bibliographic record

VenueMetals · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMicrostructure and mechanical properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersArmy Research Laboratory
KeywordsCrystal twinningMaterials scienceNucleationSlip (aerodynamics)PlasticityCritical resolved shear stressGrain boundaryStacking-fault energyDislocationCrystallographyMetallurgyMicrostructureComposite materialPhysicsChemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Owing to its ability to incorporate Schmid’s law at each integration point, crystal plasticity has proven a powerful tool to simulate and predict the slip behavior at the grain level and the ensuing heterogeneous stress/strain localization and texture evolution at the macroscopic level. Unfortunately, notwithstanding substantial efforts during the last three decades, this remarkable capability has not been replicated for materials where twinning becomes a noticeable deformation mechanism, namely in the case of low-stacking fault energy cubic, orthorhombic, and hexagonal close-packed structures. The culprit lies in the widely adopted unphysical pseudo-slip approach for capturing twin formation. While the slip is diffuse, twinning is a localized event that occurs as a drastic burst of a confined number of partial twinning dislocations establishing an interface that pursues growth through a thread of perfect twinning dislocations in the sense of bicrystallography. Moreover, at earlier stages, twin nucleation may require atomic diffusion (Shuffling) and faceting, generally demanding higher stress levels not necessarily on the twin shear plane, while triaxiality at adequate sites might be needed or preferred such as lower grain boundary misorientations or other twin boundaries. Identifying a mathematical framework in the constitutive equations for capturing these twin formation sensitivities has been a daunting challenge for crystal plasticity modelers, which has stalled ameliorating the design of key hexagonal materials for futuristic climate change-related industries. This paper reviews existing approaches to incorporating twinning in crystal plasticity models, discusses their capabilities, addresses their limitations, and suggests prospective views to fill gaps. The incorporation of a new physics-based twin nucleation criterion in crystal plasticity models holds groundbreaking potential for substantial progress in the field of computational material science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetalsSame topicMicrostructure and mechanical propertiesFrench-language works237,207