Multiview PCA: A Methodology of Feature Extraction and Dimension Reduction for High-Order Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facing with rapidly increasing demands for analyzing high-order data or multiway data, feature-extracting methods become imperative for analysis and processing. The traditional feature-extracting methods, however, either need to overly vectorize the data and smash the original structure hidden in data, such as PCA and PCA-like methods, which is unfavorable to the data recovery, or cannot eliminate the redundant information very well, such as tucker decomposition (TD) and TD-like methods. To overcome these limitations, we propose a more flexible and more powerful tool, called the multiview principal components analysis (Multiview-PCA) in this article. By segmenting a random tensor into equal-sized subarrays called sections and maximizing variations caused by orthogonal projections of these sections, the Multiview-PCA finds principal components in a parsimonious and flexible way. In so doing, two new operations on tensors, the S -direction inner/outer product, are introduced to formulate tensor projection and recovery. With different segmentation ways characterized by section depth and direction, the Multiview-PCA can be implemented many times in different ways, which defines the sequential and global Multiview-PCA, respectively. These multiple Multiview-PCA take the PCA and PCA-like, and TD and TD-like as the special cases, which correspond to the deepest section depth and the shallowest section depth, respectively. We propose an adaptive depth and direction selection algorithm for the implementation of Multiview-PCA. The Multiview-PCA is then tested in terms of subspace recovery ability, compression ability, and feature extraction performance when applied to a set of artificial data, surveillance videos, and hyperspectral imaging data. All numerical results support the flexibility, effectiveness, and usefulness of Multiview-PCA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".