MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3197686036 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3106485

Multiview PCA: A Methodology of Feature Extraction and Dimension Reduction for High-Order Data

2021· article· en· W3197686036 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDimensionality reductionComputer sciencePrincipal component analysisArtificial intelligenceDimension (graph theory)Projection (relational algebra)Tensor (intrinsic definition)Feature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsAlgorithmCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Facing with rapidly increasing demands for analyzing high-order data or multiway data, feature-extracting methods become imperative for analysis and processing. The traditional feature-extracting methods, however, either need to overly vectorize the data and smash the original structure hidden in data, such as PCA and PCA-like methods, which is unfavorable to the data recovery, or cannot eliminate the redundant information very well, such as tucker decomposition (TD) and TD-like methods. To overcome these limitations, we propose a more flexible and more powerful tool, called the multiview principal components analysis (Multiview-PCA) in this article. By segmenting a random tensor into equal-sized subarrays called sections and maximizing variations caused by orthogonal projections of these sections, the Multiview-PCA finds principal components in a parsimonious and flexible way. In so doing, two new operations on tensors, the S -direction inner/outer product, are introduced to formulate tensor projection and recovery. With different segmentation ways characterized by section depth and direction, the Multiview-PCA can be implemented many times in different ways, which defines the sequential and global Multiview-PCA, respectively. These multiple Multiview-PCA take the PCA and PCA-like, and TD and TD-like as the special cases, which correspond to the deepest section depth and the shallowest section depth, respectively. We propose an adaptive depth and direction selection algorithm for the implementation of Multiview-PCA. The Multiview-PCA is then tested in terms of subspace recovery ability, compression ability, and feature extraction performance when applied to a set of artificial data, surveillance videos, and hyperspectral imaging data. All numerical results support the flexibility, effectiveness, and usefulness of Multiview-PCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it